Tag Archives: psychosocial model

‘Is mental illness real?’ Jay Watts

Posted on April 19, 2017 by Palace Gate Counselling Service

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/12/is-mental-illness-real-google-answer?CMP=share_btn_tw Click on the above link for this interesting and important piece in the Guardian’s ‘Comment is free’ section, showing how these perceptions are gradually making it into the mainstream media…which is encouraging. For the writer, Jay still speaks in … Continue reading →

Posted in anti-depressants, anti-psychotics, autonomy, bullying, civil rights, compassion, cultural questions, diagnoses of bipolar, emotions, empathy, equality, ethics, external locus, family systems, generational trauma, healing, hearing voices, internal locus of evaluation, kindness & compassion, medical model, paradigm shift, perception, political, power, power and powerlessness, psychiatric abuse, psychiatric drugs, psychiatry, psychosis, research evidence, risk, sadness & pain, schizophrenia, shadow, trauma, violence, vulnerability | Tagged adverse childhood events, adverse childhood experience, Adverse Childhood Experience studies, adverse social conditions, affordable counselling exeter, alienation, anxiety, biased research outcomes in mental health, biased research outcomes in psychiatry, Big Pharma, biomedical intervention, biomedical model, biomedical reductionism, bipolar affective disorder, bullying, chemical imbalance myth, childhood adversity, childhood adversity and mental health, childhood experience, childhood sexual abuse, childhood trauma, cognitive dissonance, competitive culture, conceptualising distress as an illness, conceptualizing distress as an illness, counselling exeter, counsellor Exeter, counsellors Exeter, CSA, dangers of antipsychotics, denying people’s truth, depression, disease and disorder model, displacement, distress and inflammation, distress and trauma, early separation, embodied response, emotional abuse, emotional neglect, environmental causes of distress, family interventions, family systems, hyper alert, hyper vigilance, inner world, invalidation, Is mental illness real, Jay Watts, just like any other illness narrative, Lived Experience, low cost counselling exeter, making sense of human suffering, making sense of suffering, medical reductionism, medicalisation of distress, medicalisation of emotion, medicalisation of feeling, medicalisation of human experience, medicalisation of sadness, medicalising childhood, medicalising distress, medicalization, medicalization of distress, medicalization of emotion, medicalization of feeling, medicalization of human experience, medicalization of sadness, medicalizing childhood, medicalizing distress, mental health, mental health constructs, mental health policy, mental health stigma, mental illness, mental illness constructs, neurobiological paradigm, over prescription of psychotropic drugs, overprescription of antidepressants, Palace Gate Counselling Service, Palace Gate Counselling Service Exeter, paradigm shift, patriarchal model, patriarchy, person centred counselling exeter, person-centered, person-centred, pharmaceutical industry, physical abuse, politics of oppression, power relationships, privileging the biological, psychiatric model, psychiatric reductionism, psychosocial model, Recovery in the Bin, reductionism, reductionism in biomedical model, reductionism in psychiatry, reductive neurobiological paradigm, reductive paradigm, schizophrenia, scientific reductionism, separation, serotonin imbalance myth, sexual abuse in childhood, social effects of inequality, social effects of poverty, social exclusion, social factors in human distress, social inequalities, social norms, social problems, structural inequalities, structural oppressions, talking about mental health, toxic families, toxic injustice, toxic stress, unconscious bias, unequal power relationships, us and them, vulnerability, working with borderline, working with BPD, working with psychosis, working with schizophrenia, www.palacegatecounselling.org.uk | Leave a comment

‘Let’s talk about how we address mental health’ Dainius Pūras

Posted on April 7, 2017 by Palace Gate Counselling Service

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=21480&LangID=E Click on the above link to visit this U.N. site, for this address by Dainius Pūras on World Health Day. He is a psychiatrist, and representative of the United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. If you are … Continue reading →

Posted in anti-depressants, anti-psychotics, autonomy, borderline personality disorder, civil rights, client as 'expert', community, compassion, cultural questions, diagnoses of bipolar, Disconnection, DSM, emotions, empowerment, ethics, external locus, Gender & culture, healing, hearing voices, interconnection & belonging, medical model, objectification, paradigm shift, perception, political, power, psychiatric abuse, psychiatric drugs, psychiatry, psychosis, research evidence, sadness & pain, scapegoating, schizophrenia, shadow, shame, shaming, therapeutic growth, therapeutic relationship, trauma, vulnerability, working with clients | Tagged adverse childhood events, adverse childhood experience, adverse social conditions, affordable counselling exeter, biased research outcomes in mental health, biased research outcomes in psychiatry, Big Pharma, biomedical intervention, biomedical model, biomedical reductionism, childhood adversity, childhood adversity and mental health, childhood experience, childhood sexual abuse, coercive drug treatment, coercive psychiatric treatment, counselling exeter, counsellor Exeter, counsellors Exeter, CSA, Dainius Pūras, disease and disorder model, emotional abuse, forcible drug treatment, forcible psychiatric treatment, gender inequality, low cost counselling exeter, making sense of human suffering, making sense of suffering, medical reductionism, medicalisation of distress, medicalisation of emotion, medicalisation of feeling, medicalisation of human experience, medicalisation of sadness, medicalising childhood, medicalising distress, medicalization, medicalization of distress, medicalization of emotion, medicalization of feeling, medicalization of human experience, medicalization of sadness, medicalizing childhood, medicalizing distress, mental health policy, neurobiological paradigm, over prescription of psychotropic drugs, Palace Gate Counselling Service, Palace Gate Counselling Service Exeter, paradigm shift, patriarchal model, patriarchy, person centred counselling exeter, person-centered, person-centred, pharmaceutical industry, physical abuse, politics of oppression, power relationships, psychiatric model, psychiatric reductionism, psychosocial model, reductionism, reductionism in biomedical model, reductionism in psychiatry, reductive neurobiological paradigm, reductive paradigm, scientific reductionism, sexual abuse in childhood, social effects of inequality, social effects of poverty, social exclusion, social inequalities, social norms, social problems, talking about mental health, toxic stress, unequal power relationships, vulnerability, working with borderline, working with BPD, working with psychosis, working with schizophrenia, www.palacegatecounselling.org.uk | Leave a comment

‘ADHD: A Destructive and Disempowering Label; Not an Illness’ Philip Hickey

Posted on August 5, 2015 by Palace Gate Counselling Service

ADHD: A Destructive and Disempowering Label; Not an Illness ‘Psychiatry has created and promoted the self-serving fiction that childhood distractibility/impulsivity and various other human problems are illnesses that need to be “treated” with neurotoxic chemicals and other brain-damaging interventions. Suggesting at … Continue reading →

Posted in child development, civil rights, compulsive behaviour, consent, cultural questions, diagnoses of ADHD, Disconnection, diversity, DSM, emotions, ethics, external locus, growing up, Mad in America, medical model, non-conforming, perception, political, power and powerlessness, psychiatric abuse, psychiatric drugs, psychiatry, research evidence | Tagged ADHD, ADHD myth, anti-psychiatry, antipsychiatry, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Behaviorism and Mental Health, Big Pharma, biomarkers in psychiatry, bureaucratisation of the spirit, challenging DSM, chemical imbalance myth, chemical imbalance theory of depression, child psychiatry, compliance, Concerta, conforming, disease and disorder model, DSM, DSM validity, Erving Goffman, Geography of Childhood, Ilina Singh, Institute of Psychiatry, Mad in America, medicalising childhood, medicalising distress, medicalizing childhood, medicalizing distress, methylphenidate, myth of normal, non-conforming, over prescription of psychiatric drugs, pathologising behaviour, pathologizing behaviour, Philip Hickey, psychiatric diagnosis, psychiatric drug research, psychiatric drugs in children, psychiatric misdiagnosis, psychiatric model, psychiatric research, psychosocial model, Royal College of Psychiatrists, Simon Wessely, social norms, Steven Trimble | 1 Comment

Tag Archives: psychosocial model

‘Is mental illness real?’ Jay Watts

‘Let’s talk about how we address mental health’ Dainius Pūras

‘ADHD: A Destructive and Disempowering Label; Not an Illness’ Philip Hickey

Archives

Meta