Tag Archives: revised ethical framework

Ethics versus Compliance. The Institution, Ethical Psychotherapy Practice, (And Me) – Farhad Dalal

Posted on January 18, 2015 by Palace Gate Counselling Service

This is the third of our series looking at some of the issues around BACP’s proposed changes to its Ethical Framework – and why we and other practitioners so strongly object to its movement from an ethics-based code to a … Continue reading →

Posted in BACP, cultural questions, ethics, external locus, internal locus of evaluation, medical model, non-conforming, political, power and powerlessness, psychiatry, reality, regulation, risk, values & principles, working with clients | Tagged affordable counselling exeter, BACP, British Association for Counselling & Psychotherapy, code of ethics, code of practice, compliance, Conscience versus Loyalty, counselling ethics, counselling exeter, counsellor Exeter, counsellors Exeter, cult values, deontological ethics, Elias, Ethical Framework, ethics, Farhad Dalal, Foulkes, IgA, low cost counselling exeter, Mead, morals, negative liberty, Nordstrom, Palace Gate Counselling Service, Palace Gate Counselling Service Exeter, person centred counselling exeter, philosophy of counselling, revised ethical framework, virtue ethics, www.palacegatecounselling.org.uk | 2 Comments

Two letters to Tim Bond on BACP’s proposed changes to the ethical framework – Els van Ooijen

Posted on January 6, 2015 by Palace Gate Counselling Service

http://www.nepenthe.org.uk/ethics/ The second in our series of posts on BACP’s proposed changes to its Ethical Framework. We share the concern of many therapists about the nature and direction of these changes (and BACP’s political ambitions). We do not think this … Continue reading →

Posted in BACP, cultural questions, ethics, external locus, healing, internal locus of evaluation, paradigm shift, person centred, political, power, regulation, research evidence, supervision, therapeutic relationship, values & principles, working with clients | Tagged abuse of power, accountability, accountability and candour, affordable counselling exeter, Aristotle, Arthur Musgrave, autonomy, BACP, bacp petition, Ballett and Campling, beneficence, British Association for Counselling & Psychotherapy, client interests, clinical supervision, Cooper, counselling ethics, counselling exeter, counsellor Exeter, counsellors Exeter, Els van Ooijen, Ethical Framework, ethical responsibility, ethical responsibility in counselling, ethics, external locus, formative, Gillian Proctor, Gilligan, internal locus, justice, Kant, low cost counselling exeter, managerialism, Mearns, Nepenthe, Noddings, non maleficence, normative, Palace Gate Counselling Service, Palace Gate Counselling Service Exeter, Pauls and James, person centred counselling exeter, person-centered, phenomenological experience, political, power, principles, reflective practice, Regulation, relational depth, Relational Ethic of Care, relational ethics, revised ethical framework, revisions to bacp ethical framework, self respect, Slote, supervision and line management, supervision as quality assurance, supervision tasks, supportive, therapeutic relationship, Tim Bond, trustworthy, values, working to professional standards, working with clients, www.palacegatecounselling.org.uk | 1 Comment

Tag Archives: revised ethical framework

Ethics versus Compliance. The Institution, Ethical Psychotherapy Practice, (And Me) – Farhad Dalal

Two letters to Tim Bond on BACP’s proposed changes to the ethical framework – Els van Ooijen

Archives

Meta