Tag Archives: Gillian Proctor

Gillian Proctor on power in person-centered therapy

Posted on May 14, 2015 by Palace Gate Counselling Service

‘Rogers challenged the power inherent in the role of the therapist in many revolutionary ways. Rogers’ person-centred theory is based on the principle of respect for each individual and their autonomy. It is a radical theory of therapy and is … Continue reading →

Posted in Carl Rogers, empowerment, equality, ethics, internal locus of evaluation, non-directive counselling, person centred, person centred theory, power, therapeutic growth, therapeutic relationship, values & principles, working with clients | Tagged actualising, actualizing, affordable counselling exeter, authenticity, Carl Rogers, client centered therapy, client centred therapy, congruence, core conditions, counselling exeter, counsellor Exeter, counsellors Exeter, diversity, Dynamics of Power in Counselling and Psychotherapy, empathy, equalising in therapy, equalizing in therapy, external locus, Gillian Proctor, humility, humility in therapy, internal locus, internalised oppression, low cost counselling exeter, non-directive counselling, non-directive therapy, oppression, organismic, Palace Gate Counselling Service, Palace Gate Counselling Service Exeter, perceived authority, person centred counselling exeter, person-centered, person-centred, personal power, politics and therapy, power balance in therapy, power dynamics in therapy, power from within, power imbalance in therapy, power in therapy, psychological distress, shadow, therapist's power, unconditional positive regard, UPR, www.palacegatecounselling.org.uk | Leave a comment

Two letters to Tim Bond on BACP’s proposed changes to the ethical framework – Els van Ooijen

Posted on January 6, 2015 by Palace Gate Counselling Service

http://www.nepenthe.org.uk/ethics/ The second in our series of posts on BACP’s proposed changes to its Ethical Framework. We share the concern of many therapists about the nature and direction of these changes (and BACP’s political ambitions). We do not think this … Continue reading →

Posted in BACP, cultural questions, ethics, external locus, healing, internal locus of evaluation, paradigm shift, person centred, political, power, regulation, research evidence, supervision, therapeutic relationship, values & principles, working with clients | Tagged abuse of power, accountability, accountability and candour, affordable counselling exeter, Aristotle, Arthur Musgrave, autonomy, BACP, bacp petition, Ballett and Campling, beneficence, British Association for Counselling & Psychotherapy, client interests, clinical supervision, Cooper, counselling ethics, counselling exeter, counsellor Exeter, counsellors Exeter, Els van Ooijen, Ethical Framework, ethical responsibility, ethical responsibility in counselling, ethics, external locus, formative, Gillian Proctor, Gilligan, internal locus, justice, Kant, low cost counselling exeter, managerialism, Mearns, Nepenthe, Noddings, non maleficence, normative, Palace Gate Counselling Service, Palace Gate Counselling Service Exeter, Pauls and James, person centred counselling exeter, person-centered, phenomenological experience, political, power, principles, reflective practice, Regulation, relational depth, Relational Ethic of Care, relational ethics, revised ethical framework, revisions to bacp ethical framework, self respect, Slote, supervision and line management, supervision as quality assurance, supervision tasks, supportive, therapeutic relationship, Tim Bond, trustworthy, values, working to professional standards, working with clients, www.palacegatecounselling.org.uk | 1 Comment

Tag Archives: Gillian Proctor

Gillian Proctor on power in person-centered therapy

Two letters to Tim Bond on BACP’s proposed changes to the ethical framework – Els van Ooijen

Archives

Meta